This website cannot be viewed properly using this version of Internet Explorer.

To ensure your security while viewing this site, please use a modern browser such as Chrome or update to a newer version of Internet Explorer.

Download Chrome (Made by Google)
Update Internet Explorer (Made by Microsoft)

A A A

First Judicial District Court

Tribunal del Primer Distrito Judicial

English Español

Last Updated: 4/3/2020


Judge T. Glenn Ellington


UPDATE

Dear attorneys:

The criminal judges in the First Judicial District Court have established the following general protocols. These may change as appropriate and we will certainly advise you immediately of any changes.

1.  Attorneys may appear by phone and their clients need not be present in court for the following hearings, subject to the conditions stated:

                a)  Attorneys must make an email request in writing to the Judge's TCAA at least 24 hours in advance, which email must contain the telephone number at which the attorney can be reached.  Attorneys must be available at least five minutes before the scheduled hearing and continue to be available until the attorney receives a telephone call from the Court.

                b) Status conference on competency evaluations. Attorneys may appear by phone, out-of-custody defendants need not appear in court, in-custody will continue to appear via video in Judge Marlowe Sommer's courtroom. Judge Ellington will be doing video now. Judge Lidyard will make a determination based on the availability of video.

                c) Presentment Hearings. Counsel may appear by phone.

                d) Probation Violation Arraignments. Attorneys may appear by phone. Defendants will continue to appear via video in Judge Marlowe Sommer's courtroom. Judge Ellington will be doing video now. Judge Lidyard will make a determination based upon the availability of video.

                e) Probation status conferences. Attorneys may appear by phone. Out-of-custody defendants need not appear in court. In-custody defendants will continue to appear via video in Judge Marlowe Sommer's courtroom.  Judge Ellington will be doing video now. Judge Lidyard will make a determination based upon the availability of video.

                f) Arraignments. Attorneys may appear by phone, provided that there is a waiver signed by the defendant and conditions of release submitted to the court three days prior to arraignment. Arraignments will still be listed on the court's docket and it is up to counsel to comply with this time deadline. These will be handled similar to presentment hearings in that the matter will be called to assure compliance and track the case. If there is not a waiver, then the state and defense counsel must appear, the out-of-custody defendant must appear, and the in-custody defendant must be transported. Transportation of an in-custody defendant is discouraged and defense attorneys are instructed to make all deliberate effort to comply with the time deadlines. The Court does not want in-custody or out-of custody defendants present in court simply because defense counsel was dilatory in getting the arraignment papers timely submitted.

                g) There are no longer Pretrial Conferences. They will stay on the court's docket similar to arraignments and three days before the court's docket, the attorneys must file a Certificate of Compliance that they have met and conferred, detailing the status of discovery and preparedness for trial. These will be handled similar to presentment hearings in that the matter will be called to assure compliance and track the case.

                h) Docket Calls. State and defense counsel may appear by phone. Out-of-custody defendants need not be present in court and in-custody will not be transported. If a continuance is requested, the temporary protocol is as follows: If the State is requesting a continuance then it will be held against the State. If Defendant is requesting a continuance then the Defendant must have a waiver of speedy trial rights signed by defendant submitted three days prior to Docket Call.  If the parties are jointly a requesting a continuance it will be held neutral.  If both parties wish to proceed to trial on that particular docket, the court will accommodate unless administrative necessity due to the coronavirus requires the court to set trial further out.  If the parties dispute which side a continuance should be attributed to, it will be held neutrally, and the court will reconsider the matter at a later date upon a motion to reconsider.

                i) Release hearings under NMRA Rule 5-403. The rule entitles the defendant to be present.  The court will not transport a defendant at the release hearing as a matter of course. Instead, counsel will confer before or at the scheduled hearing and with the court, determine whether the defendant may be released on conditions of release or an evidentiary hearing on the motion to revoke conditions of release is required. If a defendant wishes to assert his entitlement to be present at a release hearing, counsel must do a timely transport order. 

                j) Release hearings under NMRA Rule 5-401. The court will not transport a defendant at the release hearing as a matter of course. Instead, counsel will confer before or at the scheduled hearing and with the court, determine defendant's conditions of release.  

2.  Evidentiary hearings such as preventative detention hearings, competency evaluation challenges, probation violation evidentiary hearings, revocation of conditions of release evidentiary hearings, motions to suppress, etc. - counsel must be present, probation officers must be present, electronic monitoring must be present, expert witnesses must be present or counsel must motion the court for telephonic appearance, and defendant must be present and in-custody will be transported. Counsel for the State and Defendant are directed to timely confer prior to a hearing to see if a stipulation which negates the need for an evidentiary hearing can be accomplished.

3. When counsel and/or defendants appear in court the protocol is that all persons shall remain 6 feet apart. Therefore, the distance between counsel table and lecterns will be adjusted accordingly. Out-of-custody defendants will stay in the gallery and a microphone will be provided at the banister.  In-custody defendants will stay at the threshold leading into the courtroom from the secure area and a microphone will be set up for them.

4. There will be no pleas taken extemporaneously.  No plea will be set without a signed plea agreement and a request for change of plea.  These should be entered in proposed text to alert the court.

5. The Rio Arriba County Detention Center will have a video conference available Monday through Friday from 4:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.  These are for attorney-client consultations. The Rio Arriba video for private defense counsel will be in Judge Marlowe Sommer's conference room attached to her courtroom. There will need to be a schedule in place to accommodate counsel.

6. The Santa Fe County Detention Center will have a video conference available Monday through Friday from ______________________. These are for attorney-client consultations. The Santa Fe video for private defense counsel will be in Judge Ellington's conference room attached to his courtroom. There will need to be a schedule in place to accommodate counsel.

7. Both the Rio Arriba County Detention Center and the Santa Fe County Detention Center will accommodate phone conferences between attorney and client on a daily basis. 

8. Grand juries that have already convened are suspended, until the District Attorney's office submits a Petition to reconvene.  The convening of further grand juries will be determined by the Court upon petition by the District Attorney.


Note: THE COURT FOLLOWS THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHEDULE REGARDING SNOW DAYS. IF THERE IS A TWO HOUR DELAY, THE COURT WILL START WITH THE FIRST CASE ON THE DOCKET AND NO CASES WILL BE RESET. IF THE COURT IS CLOSED ON THE DAY SET FOR YOUR CASE, YOUR CASE WILL BE RESET.


Interpreter Scheduling

To avoid delay or the rescheduling of your hearing, you must notify the TCAA at 455-8180 within 5 days of your scheduled hearing  that an interpreter is needed.


04/06/2020

8:00 AM

Judge T. Glenn Ellington General Session

 

8:05 AM

  

  ** Confidential **

D-101-SI-2019-00102

Competency Review Hearing

  Lower Court Competency

Comment: 

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Wahlquist, Kent     

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:     

 

8:05 AM

  

  ** Confidential **

D-101-SI-2020-00002

Competency Review Hearing

  Lower Court Competency

Comment: 

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:         

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:     

 

8:10 AM

D-101-CR-2018-00605

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Garcia, Vanessa E

STATUS CONFERENCE

Martinez, Carol 

Def Atty:  Solomon, Jasmine Jade

Comment:  STATUS ON PVR

 

8:15 AM

D-101-CR-2017-00086

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Garcia, Vanessa E

STATUS CONFERENCE

TORREZ, CHRISTOPHER 

Def Atty:  Solomon, Jasmine Jade

Comment:  STATUS ON PVR

 

8:15 AM

D-101-CR-2019-00111

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Garcia, Vanessa E

STATUS CONFERENCE

ASHBAUGH, JONATHAN 

Def Atty:  Kerwin, Bradford Kenneth

Comment:  STATUS ON PVR

 

8:15 AM

D-101-CR-2018-00609

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Garcia, Vanessa E

STATUS CONFERENCE

ASHBAUGH, JONATHAN 

Def Atty:  Lucero, Marcus A.

Comment:  STATUS ON PVR

 

8:25 AM

D-101-CR-2016-00489

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Garcia, Vanessa E

PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT

Valdivia, Derrek 

Def Atty:  Fischer, Kathryn T.

Comment: 

 

8:35 AM

D-101-CR-2014-00695

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Garcia, Vanessa E

PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT

Viscarra, Denise 

Def Atty:  Dickey, Kristen Rae

Comment:  SERVED 3/6/20. WARRANT RETURN NOT RECEIVED UNTIL 3/27/20

 

8:40 AM

D-101-CR-2018-00809

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Manning, E. Nicole

PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT

MARTINEZ, DESIREE L 

Def Atty:  Mnuk-herrmann, Rebecca

Comment: 

 

8:50 AM

D-101-CR-2018-00727

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Manning, E. Nicole

PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT

MARTINEZ, HENRY JUSTIN 

Def Atty:  Smith, Dorie Concetta Biagianti

Comment:  NOA not received until 3/30/20

 

9:00 AM

D-101-CR-2018-00157

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Garcia, Vanessa E

STATUS CONFERENCE

Moore, James R, Jr. 

Def Atty:  Marlowe, Daniel R.

Comment:  STATUS ON PVR

 

9:00 AM

D-101-CR-2018-00525

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Garcia, Vanessa E

STATUS CONFERENCE

Moore, James R, Jr. 

Def Atty:  Carlisle, Matthew J.

Comment:  STATUS ON PVR

 

9:00 AM

D-101-CR-2018-00531

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Garcia, Vanessa E

STATUS CONFERENCE

Moore, James R, Jr. 

Def Atty:  Carlisle, Matthew J.

Comment:  STATUS ON PVR

 

9:30 AM

D-101-CR-2018-00651

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Shapiro, David

EVIDENTIARY HEARING

Gonzales, Alfredo 

Def Atty:  Solomon, Jasmine Jade

Comment: 

 

10:00 AM

D-101-CR-2018-00811

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Skinner, Derek Lee

STATUS CONFERENCE

SANCHEZ, CARLOS 

Def Atty:  Rassoul, Shaheen

Comment:  Status on Sentencing

 

10:10 AM

D-101-CR-2020-00108

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Shapiro, David

PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT

PEREZ, MARIO L 

Def Atty:  Ruyle, Sam P.

Comment: 

 

10:30 AM

D-101-CR-2020-00164

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Skinner, Derek Lee

ARRAIGNMENT

Quintana, Matthew S 

Def Atty:  

Comment:  RESET FROM 3/23/20

 

10:30 AM

D-101-CR-2020-00149

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Shapiro, David

ARRAIGNMENT

Leyba, Joel 

Def Atty:  Carlisle, Matthew J.

Comment:  RESET FROM 3/23/20

 

10:40 AM

D-101-CR-2020-00176

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   James, Jacqueline Susanne

ARRAIGNMENT

Elliott, Maury Montel 

Def Atty:  

Comment:  VIDEO

 

10:50 AM

D-101-CR-2020-00179

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:  

ARRAIGNMENT

PALOMINO-LOYA, ENRIQUE 

Def Atty:  

Comment: 

 

11:00 AM

D-101-CR-2020-00123

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Manning, E. Nicole

STATUS CONFERENCE

Cummings, Stephen 

Def Atty:  Solomon, Jasmine Jade

Comment: 

 

1:00 PM

  

  ** Confidential **

D-101-SI-2020-00029

Competency Review Hearing

  Lower Court Competency

Comment: 

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Wahlquist, Kent     

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Dickson, Mark 

 

1:00 PM

  

  ** Confidential **

D-101-SI-2020-00022

Competency Review Hearing

  Lower Court Competency

Comment:  Got email from Clerk on 3/25, Travelled to FL and isi n 14 day quarentine

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Wahlquist, Kent     

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:     

 

1:00 PM

  

  ** Confidential **

D-101-SI-2020-00019

Competency Review Hearing

  Lower Court Competency

Comment: 

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Wahlquist, Kent     

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Dickson, Mark 

 

1:00 PM

  

  ** Confidential **

D-101-SI-2020-00015

Competency Review Hearing

  Lower Court Competency

Comment: 

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Wahlquist, Kent     

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Dickson, Mark 

 

1:15 PM

D-101-CR-2020-00134

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Skinner, Derek Lee

ARRAIGNMENT

GARCIA, JAZZMINE 

Def Atty:  Whitley, L. Val

Comment:  RESET-BW NOT ISSUED FOR FTA ON 3/9/20

 

1:15 PM

D-101-CR-2020-00141

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Shapiro, David

ARRAIGNMENT

Estrella, Fabian 

Def Atty:  Rassoul, Shaheen

Comment:  RESET-BW NOT ISSUED FOR FTA ON 3/9/20

 

1:15 PM

D-101-CR-2020-00128

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Shapiro, David

ARRAIGNMENT

Estrella, Fabian 

Def Atty:  Rassoul, Shaheen

Comment:  RESET-BW NOT ISSUED FOR FTA ON 3/9/20

 

1:15 PM

D-101-CR-2020-00148

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Maxwell, Martin H.

ARRAIGNMENT

Alarid Heidal, Trevor Paul 

Def Atty:  Whitley, L. Val

Comment:  RESET-BW NOT ISSUED FOR FTA ON 3/9/20

 

1:15 PM

D-101-CR-2020-00147

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Maxwell, Martin H.

ARRAIGNMENT

CHAVEZ, KIMBERLY M 

Def Atty:  Carlisle, Matthew J.

Comment:  RESET-BW NOT ISSUED FOR FTA ON 3/9/20

 

1:15 PM

D-101-CR-2020-00178

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:  

ARRAIGNMENT

VIGIL, DOMINIC ERNEST 

Def Atty:  Whitley, L. Val

Comment: 

 

1:15 PM

D-101-CR-2020-00174

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Shapiro, David

ARRAIGNMENT

Sanchez, Adrian 

Def Atty:  

Comment: 

 

1:15 PM

D-101-CR-2020-00173

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Shapiro, David

ARRAIGNMENT

Madrid, Stephanie 

Def Atty:  

Comment: 

 

1:15 PM

D-101-CR-2020-00172

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Shapiro, David

ARRAIGNMENT

QUINTANA, GENE J 

Def Atty:  

Comment: 

 

2:00 PM

D-101-CR-2019-00502

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Warren, Russell S., III

PLEA CONFERENCE

CHAVEZ, GARY M 

Def Atty:  Rassoul, Shaheen

Comment: 

 

2:00 PM

D-101-CR-2018-00388

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Garcia, Vanessa E

MOTION HEARING

MARES, JOSEPH SEAN 

Def Atty:  Smith, Dorie Concetta Biagianti

Comment:  MOTION TO REVOKE PROBATION (IN LIEU OF BW)

 

2:00 PM

D-101-CR-2019-00104

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Garcia, Vanessa E

MOTION HEARING

CARPENTER, RACHEL K 

Def Atty:  Leavell, Julita Ann

Comment:  MOTION TO REVOKE PROBATION(IN LIEU OF BW)

 

2:00 PM

D-101-CR-2019-00559

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Jenkins, David

PLEA CONFERENCE

KAPINSKI, ANTHONY 

Def Atty:  Chacon, M. David, Ii

Comment: 

 

2:30 PM

D-101-CR-2019-00502

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Warren, Russell S., III

MOTION HEARING

CHAVEZ, GARY M 

Def Atty:  Rassoul, Shaheen

Comment:  Court's Motion to Review Conditions of Release fue to EM Violation

 

3:30 PM

D-101-CR-2018-00549

State of New Mexico vs

Pros Atty:   Shapiro, David

PLEA CONFERENCE

Chavez, Jesus D 

Def Atty:  Solomon, Jasmine Jade

Comment: 

 

04/08/2020

8:00 AM

Judge T. Glenn Ellington General Session

 

8:30 AM

 D-101-JQ-2020-00002

 ** Confidential **

 CUSTODY HEARING

 Abuse & Neglect

Comment:

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:  Ruybalid, Francisco E., IV  

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Fitzgerald, Robert; Bass, Caroline

 

1:00 PM

 D-101-JQ-2019-00003

 ** Confidential **

 ADJUDICATORY HEARING

 Abuse & Neglect

Comment: continued

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:  Ruybalid, Francisco E., IV  

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Foster, David R.; Ray, Brian T.

 

04/09/2020

8:00 AM

Judge T. Glenn Ellington General Session

 

9:00 AM

 D-117-JQ-2020-00008

 ** Confidential **

 CUSTODY HEARING

 Abuse & Neglect

Comment:

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:  Bevacqua-Young, Donna M.  

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Bass, Caroline; Musselman, Elizabeth Ann

 

10:00 AM

 D-101-JQ-2018-00018

 ** Confidential **

 TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS HEARING

 Abuse & Neglect

Comment:

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:  Ruybalid, Francisco E., IV  

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Musselman, Elizabeth Ann; Fitzgerald, Robert

 

1:15 PM

 D-101-JQ-2019-00014

 ** Confidential **

 JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING

 Abuse & Neglect

Comment:

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:  Ruybalid, Francisco E., IV  

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Musselman, Elizabeth Ann; Fitzgerald, Robert

 

1:30 PM

 D-101-JQ-2019-00023

 ** Confidential **

 ADJUDICATORY HEARING

 Abuse & Neglect

Comment:

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:  Ruybalid, Francisco E., IV  

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Bass, Caroline; Ray, Brian T.

 

1:45 PM

 D-101-JQ-2018-00018

 ** Confidential **

 PERMANENCY HEARING

 Abuse & Neglect

Comment: EXTENSION OF CUSTODY AS WELL.

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:  Ruybalid, Francisco E., IV  

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Musselman, Elizabeth Ann; Fitzgerald, Robert

 

2:15 PM

 D-101-JQ-2017-00020

 ** Confidential **

 STATUS CONFERENCE

 Abuse & Neglect

Comment:

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:  Gonsalves, Mario M.  

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Musselman, Elizabeth Ann

 

2:30 PM

 D-101-JQ-2016-00020

 ** Confidential **

 SUBSEQUENT PERMANENCY HEARING

 Abuse & Neglect

Comment:

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:  Bass, Caroline  

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:   

 

2:45 PM

 D-101-JQ-2016-00017

 ** Confidential **

 SUBSEQUENT PERMANENCY HEARING

 Abuse & Neglect

Comment:

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:  Bass, Caroline  

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Musselman, Elizabeth Ann

 

3:00 PM

 D-101-JQ-2019-00021

 ** Confidential **

 JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING

 Abuse & Neglect

Comment:

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:  Ruybalid, Francisco E., IV  

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Musselman, Elizabeth Ann; Ray, Brian T.

 

3:30 PM

 D-101-JQ-2019-00015

 ** Confidential **

 JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING

 Abuse & Neglect

Comment:

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:  Ruybalid, Francisco E., IV  

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Ray, Brian T.

 

4:00 PM

 D-101-JQ-2018-00019

 ** Confidential **

 SUBSEQUENT PERMANENCY HEARING

 Abuse & Neglect

Comment:

Petitioner:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:  Ruybalid, Francisco E., IV  

Respondent:

 ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential **

Atty:    Musselman, Elizabeth Ann; Ray, Brian T.; Poulin, Debra D.; Fitzgerald, Robert